Inspired or Rip-off?

12 Nov
2007

Anyone who knows me knows that I’m a metropolis kind-of-guy. I like walking around to get what I want. I hate using my car. Toronto was ideal for me – within 5 minutes I had everything I could want – subway, grocery stores, dozens of restaurants (I lived in Yorkville), dozens of shops, 24 hour convenience stores, etc. I talk alot about the true sustainability of such living (and the opposite for suburbia).

So when I saw Walk Score I was like – damn. I should have thought of this before. It’s so bloody simple!

At the same time, it is more a feature and less a company. Analytic sites agree – it spiked the past two months, but started falling in October. And only keeps going lower.

Furthermore – I think a lot more could be done with it. And it could integrate brilliantly into other aspects of iBegin.

So the question is – if we build our own version, improve it, and give credit to Walk Score as our inspiration – is that a rip-off, or a true inspiration?

6 Responses to Inspired or Rip-off?

Avatar

Ben

November 12th, 2007 at 7:15 pm

If you add to the concept – inspired.

If you copy verbatim – rip-off.

Avatar

Allison

November 12th, 2007 at 7:19 pm

Hmmm, I am leaning toward more of an inspired rip off? No, really, I would view it as passing the baton & inspiration.

Avatar

Andre Marcelo-Tanner

November 12th, 2007 at 7:25 pm

Like what Ben, if you copy it without changing anything, ripoff, but could be called a copycat (nicer word) if you give due credit to walkscore.

if you improve like get the real walk score around water and other obstacles, its inspired

Avatar

Jacob

November 12th, 2007 at 8:09 pm

If you give credit to Walkscore, it’s inspiration, if you don’t give credit, I think it’s still inspiration. It’s a nice idea, but people take nice ideas all the time and make them better

Avatar

Matt C

November 13th, 2007 at 9:27 am

I think that 99% of the ideas that make it into web software aren’t really unique anymore. I hate discovering a feature in a competing product that I came up with organically, but it happens a lot. The “open” web philosophy is centered around building on other good ideas and expanding them. The differentiator is how well you execute.

Avatar

Hany

November 13th, 2007 at 6:05 pm

It’s just like Matt said. In this day and age, it’s truly impossible to be 100% unique. I say take the idea, improve it, add on to it, and re-display it. That’s how a lot of the internet is nowadays…sharing similar ideas with minimal difference. As long as you add more features to it and improve it, I see no problem with it. You were inspired :)

top